requiem for certainty

Symposium on ‘Genealogy as Critique’

with 4 comments

Out in the latest issue of Foucault Studies (in the review essay section)–a symposium on my ‘Genealogy as Critique.’  Honored am I that Amy Allen, Eduardo Mendieta, & Kevin Olson have taken the time to develop responses both careful and critical in orientation.  A hope is that this exchange will help further ongoing conversations about the role and status of critical theory vis-a-vis the contemporary (in Rabinow’s sense of that term).  Some of the topics covered in the symposium (which consists of responses by Allen, Mendieta, and Olson plus my reply): normativity (+ cryptonormativity + normativeness), the status of universality and contingency, the place (or not) of the transcendental in genealogy, the relation between methodology and deployment in philosophy, and how to thinking about the challenge of choosing a problem (object, space, field) for inquiry.

Advertisements

Written by Colin Koopman

October 17, 2014 at 4:36 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. dmf

    October 19, 2014 at 1:35 pm

  2. Thanks for this link, Dirk. The videos here (https://www.youtube.com/user/OSUSHPR/search?query=genealogy) are for another symposium on the ‘Genealogy’ book held up at Oregon State University, organized by the excellent Stephanie Jenkins, and featuring discussion by Jenkins, Sharyn Clough, and Evan Gottleib.

    Colin Koopman

    January 3, 2015 at 1:21 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: